Opened 5 years ago
Last modified 4 years ago
#9269 new defect
ffmpeg produces broken files when cutting mp4s
| Reported by: | Artem S. Tashkinov | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Component: | undetermined |
| Version: | git-master | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Blocked By: | ||
| Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: | no | |
| Analyzed by developer: | no |
Description (last modified by )
Summary of the bug: when fast seeking along with specifying the length, ffmpeg produces files with broken PTS timestamps.
How to reproduce:
/tmp/ffmpeg/ffmpeg -ss 00:01:00 -i "source.mp4" -t 10 -c copy /tmp/100-10.mp4
ffmpeg version N-102619-gebedd26eef Copyright (c) 2000-2021 the FFmpeg developers
built with gcc 10 (GCC)
configuration: --disable-static --enable-nonfree --enable-avfilter --disable-shared --enable-static --enable-gpl --enable-postproc --enable-pthreads --enable-libspeex --enable-libmp3lame --enable-libx264 --enable-libxvid --enable-libopus --enable-libopenjpeg --disable-debug --disable-doc --enable-libpulse --extra-cflags='-mtune=generic' --enable-version3 --enable-libvorbis --enable-libfdk-aac --enable-gnutls --enable-libfreetype --enable-libx265 --enable-libdav1d --libdir=/usr/local/lib64 --enable-lto --enable-pic --prefix=/tmp/ffmpeg
libavutil 57. 0.100 / 57. 0.100
libavcodec 59. 1.100 / 59. 1.100
libavformat 59. 2.101 / 59. 2.101
libavdevice 59. 0.100 / 59. 0.100
libavfilter 8. 0.101 / 8. 0.101
libswscale 6. 0.100 / 6. 0.100
libswresample 4. 0.100 / 4. 0.100
libpostproc 56. 0.100 / 56. 0.100
Input #0, mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2, from 'source.mp4':
Metadata:
major_brand : mp42
minor_version : 0
compatible_brands: isommp42
Duration: 00:02:30.14, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 17106 kb/s
Stream #0:0(eng): Video: h264 (Baseline) (avc1 / 0x31637661), yuv420p, 1920x1080, 16995 kb/s, SAR 1:1 DAR 16:9, 29.85 fps, 29.85 tbr, 90k tbn (default)
Metadata:
handler_name : VideoHandle
vendor_id : [0][0][0][0]
Stream #0:1(eng): Audio: aac (LC) (mp4a / 0x6134706D), 48000 Hz, mono, fltp, 96 kb/s (default)
Metadata:
handler_name : SoundHandle
vendor_id : [0][0][0][0]
Output #0, mp4, to '/tmp/100-10.mp4':
Metadata:
major_brand : mp42
minor_version : 0
compatible_brands: isommp42
encoder : Lavf59.2.101
Stream #0:0(eng): Video: h264 (Baseline) (avc1 / 0x31637661), yuv420p, 1920x1080 [SAR 1:1 DAR 16:9], q=2-31, 16995 kb/s, 29.85 fps, 29.85 tbr, 90k tbn (default)
Metadata:
handler_name : VideoHandle
vendor_id : [0][0][0][0]
Stream #0:1(eng): Audio: aac (LC) (mp4a / 0x6134706D), 48000 Hz, mono, fltp, 96 kb/s (default)
Metadata:
handler_name : SoundHandle
vendor_id : [0][0][0][0]
Stream mapping:
Stream #0:0 -> #0:0 (copy)
Stream #0:1 -> #0:1 (copy)
Press [q] to stop, [?] for help
frame= 323 fps=0.0 q=-1.0 Lsize= 22611kB time=00:00:10.01 bitrate=18499.6kbits/s speed=1.12e+03x
video:22473kB audio:127kB subtitle:0kB other streams:0kB global headers:0kB muxing overhead: 0.046347%
Tested with ffmpeg-4.4 and the current ffmpeg snapshot.
Also discussed here: https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/issues/8876
The resulting files produced by ffmpeg:
4.4 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hdK51zO0ANLjIX9bC_OVd-jBv7_ReLbH/view?usp=sharing
GIT: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1AWnpx3xgf7g-oiYLE3HGzlRouXe6Ea4T/view?usp=sharing
Using slow seeking (-ss timestamp after the source file) fixes the issue.
Change History (2)
comment:1 by , 5 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|
comment:2 by , 4 years ago
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.



I can confirm similar behaviour using ffmpeg 4.4.1.
However, see this extract from https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Seeking :
So, I suggest we use a different cutting strategy : cut audio & video at the same (innacurate) point, instead of including some seconds of audio with no video, because that confuses some players (and people ;)). IMHO, this I-frame cut is a limitation which shouldn't lead to a different length in audio and video streams, but the same lenght, to keep the audio & video coherent (even though the seeking point won't be exactly respected). What do you think?
Would you (ffmpeg developers) agree to modify this strategy?