Opened 2 months ago
Last modified 8 weeks ago
#11192 new defect
Raw H264 stream has incorrect frame rate
Reported by: | ariley | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | important | Component: | avformat |
Version: | git-master | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Blocked By: | ||
Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: | no | |
Analyzed by developer: | no |
Description
ffmpeg incorrectly decides that the frame rate for the certain H264 streams is 25fps, rather than 29.97fps:
$ ./ffprobe regression_ba4b73c977.h264 ffprobe version N-110262-gba4b73c977 Copyright (c) 2007-2023 the FFmpeg developers built with gcc 12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) configuration: --extra-cflags=-g --extra-cxxflags=-g --optflags=-O0 libavutil 58. 6.100 / 58. 6.100 libavcodec 60. 9.100 / 60. 9.100 libavformat 60. 4.101 / 60. 4.101 libavdevice 60. 2.100 / 60. 2.100 libavfilter 9. 5.100 / 9. 5.100 libswscale 7. 2.100 / 7. 2.100 libswresample 4. 11.100 / 4. 11.100 [h264 @ 0x564e43afcdc0] Stream #0: not enough frames to estimate rate; consider increasing probesize Input #0, h264, from 'regression_ba4b73c977.h264': Duration: N/A, bitrate: N/A Stream #0:0: Video: h264 (High 4:2:2), yuv422p10le(tv, bt709, top first), 1920x1080 [SAR 1:1 DAR 16:9], 25 fps, 29.97 tbr, 1200k tbn
This is a regression -- prior to ba4b73c977
, the FPS value was correctly detected as 29.97:
$ ./ffprobe incorrect_fps.h264 ffprobe version N-110261-gd56652fdc8 Copyright (c) 2007-2023 the FFmpeg developers built with gcc 12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) configuration: --extra-cflags=-g --extra-cxxflags=-g --optflags=-O0 libavutil 58. 6.100 / 58. 6.100 libavcodec 60. 9.100 / 60. 9.100 libavformat 60. 4.101 / 60. 4.101 libavdevice 60. 2.100 / 60. 2.100 libavfilter 9. 5.100 / 9. 5.100 libswscale 7. 2.100 / 7. 2.100 libswresample 4. 11.100 / 4. 11.100 [h264 @ 0x556699756dc0] Stream #0: not enough frames to estimate rate; consider increasing probesize Input #0, h264, from 'regression_ba4b73c977.h264': Duration: N/A, bitrate: N/A Stream #0:0: Video: h264 (High 4:2:2), yuv422p10le(tv, bt709, top first), 1920x1080 [SAR 1:1 DAR 16:9], 29.97 fps, 29.97 tbr, 1200k tbn
Increasing the probe size does not help.
Change History (4)
comment:1 by , 2 months ago
comment:2 by , 2 months ago
Not quite sure how you can make the assertion that I didn't test master?
$ git branch * master $ ./ffprobe regression_ba4b73c977.h264 ffprobe version N-117011-gbb91425eb8 Copyright (c) 2007-2024 the FFmpeg developers built with gcc 12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) configuration: --extra-cflags=-g --extra-cxxflags=-g --optflags=-O0 libavutil 59. 36.100 / 59. 36.100 libavcodec 61. 13.100 / 61. 13.100 libavformat 61. 5.101 / 61. 5.101 libavdevice 61. 2.101 / 61. 2.101 libavfilter 10. 2.102 / 10. 2.102 libswscale 8. 2.100 / 8. 2.100 libswresample 5. 2.100 / 5. 2.100 [h264 @ 0x555f4b2ef640] Stream #0: not enough frames to estimate rate; consider increasing probesize Input #0, h264, from 'regression_ba4b73c977.h264': Duration: N/A, bitrate: N/A Stream #0:0: Video: h264 (High 4:2:2), yuv422p10le(tv, bt709, top first), 1920x1080 [SAR 1:1 DAR 16:9], 25 fps, 59.94 tbr, 1200k tbn $ git log --pretty=oneline | perl -pe'exit if (/ba4b73c977/)' | wc -l 6749
The results in my initial report are from doing a git-bisect on the master branch. It may be 6750 commits back in history, but I'm pretty sure I'm still on the master branch.
If this is a known bug, then I'm happy to have it closed as a duplicate, but I wasn't able to find any mention of it in trac -- perhaps I'm not using the correct search terms.
comment:3 by , 2 months ago
#9814 there the bug is that the file is tagged 30/1.001 but the result is 29970/1000... Nowadays it is 25 fps, which is wrong.
comment:4 by , 2 months ago
Thanks. IMO, I think it's better to leave these as two distinct issues. #9814 is filed as a "wish" request for better precision in reporting the frame rate. The brokenness of ffmpeg suddenly returning 25fps for 29.97fps essence is orthogonal (but confounding) to the original request. This latter certainly needs fixing, and is (I suspect) likely to be overlooked if the only report of it is in the midst of comments on a wish list issue.
You did not test master. That has a bug that it recogizes all Annex B as 25 fps