Changes between Version 71 and Version 72 of Encode/HighQualityAudio


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Oct 8, 2024, 4:25:26 PM (20 months ago)
Author:
MasterQuestionable
Comment:

Doubt on Vorbis "Neither high quality nor widely supported".

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Encode/HighQualityAudio

    v71 v72  
    9797  Transparency: Ditto.
    9898- **"libvorbis"** - Usable range ≥ 96 Kbps. Recommended range "-b:a 192k" (≥ 192 Kbps).\\
    99   Neither high quality nor widely supported, avoid.
     99  <&>Neither high quality nor widely supported, avoid.</&> [ Explanation? ]
    100100- **"libmp3lame"** - Usable range ≥ 128 Kbps. Recommended range "-aq 2" (≥ 192 Kbps).
    101101- **"ac3"** or **"eac3"** - Usable range ≥ 160 Kbps. Recommended range ≥ 160 Kbps.\\
    … …  
    105105- **"libtwolame"** - Usable range ≥ 192 Kbps. Recommended range ≥ 256 Kbps.
    106106- **"mp2"** - Usable range ≥ 320 Kbps. Recommended range ≥ 320 Kbps.
     107
     108[ MasterQuestionable:\\
     109͏    Per my experience, Vorbis appears to be sort of FLAC substitute at high bit rate:\\
     110͏    That plain (without proper lossy pre-filtering) FLAC maybe too pointlessly big.\\
     111͏    And Vorbis's output viewed in spectrogram... appeared quite similar; and maintained reasonable size.
     112
     113͏    Support-wise, Vorbis appears to be more widely supported than Opus:\\
     114͏    I've seen what support Opus typically also support Vorbis. But scarcely vice-versa. ]\\
     115\\
    107116
    108117͏    "**vorbis**" and "**wmav1**"/"**wmav2**" encoders are not worth using.\\