Opened 2 years ago
Last modified 2 years ago
#9872 new defect
WebP vs PNG alpha
Reported by: | Jozef Chutka | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Component: | undetermined |
Version: | unspecified | Keywords: | scale alpha |
Cc: | Jozef Chutka | Blocked By: | |
Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: | no | |
Analyzed by developer: | no |
Description (last modified by )
using ffmpeg version 2022-07-31-git-1368b5a725-full_build-www.gyan.dev
Attached x.png and x.webp (webp created from png) have transparent background covered by white X shape.
For some reason FFmpeg scale filter treats the x.png and x.webp differently.
Applying scale filter on the x.webp, causes the output video alpha around the X shape to be premultiplied and so renders with ugly edges.
Following commands, esp. out-webp-scale.png output demonstrates the issue:
ffmpeg -filter_complex "color=white:200x200[b];movie=x.png,[b]overlay" -y out-png.png ffmpeg -filter_complex "color=white:200x200[b];movie=x.png,scale=200:200,[b]overlay" -y out-png-scale.png ffmpeg -filter_complex "color=white:200x200[b];movie=x.webp,[b]overlay" -y out-webp.png ffmpeg -filter_complex "color=white:200x200[b];movie=x.webp,scale=200:200,[b]overlay" -y out-webp-scale.png
I tried all possible scale filter flags, and also format changing (before and after scale) but no luck to achieve the same result. I am able to un-premultipy the problematic one with unpremultiply
filter but I would like to avoid it.
I wonder if this is a bug or an expected behaviour.
Attachments (8)
Change History (14)
by , 2 years ago
by , 2 years ago
by , 2 years ago
Attachment: | out-png.png added |
---|
by , 2 years ago
Attachment: | out-png-scale.png added |
---|
by , 2 years ago
Attachment: | out-webp.png added |
---|
by , 2 years ago
Attachment: | out-webp-scale.png added |
---|
comment:1 by , 2 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:2 by , 2 years ago
Keywords: | png webp removed |
---|
comment:3 by , 2 years ago
Hi Carl,
files are different in format png vs webp, however the content/pixels it contains is the same. I am reporting that the scale filter produces different output for such setup (same pixels, different input format).
Can you please elaborate how can I use rawvideo in my case?
Attaching console output of the problematic command:
ffmpeg -filter_complex "color=white:200x200[b];movie=x.webp,scale=200:200,[b]overlay" -y out-webp-scale.png ffmpeg version 2022-07-31-git-1368b5a725-full_build-www.gyan.dev Copyright (c) 2000-2022 the FFmpeg developers built with gcc 12.1.0 (Rev2, Built by MSYS2 project) configuration: --enable-gpl --enable-version3 --enable-static --disable-w32threads --disable-autodetect --enable-fontconfig --enable-iconv --enable-gnutls --enable-libxml2 --enable-gmp --enable-bzlib --enable-lzma --enable-libsnappy --enable-zlib --enable-librist --enable-libsrt --enable-libssh --enable-libzmq --enable-avisynth --enable-libbluray --enable-libcaca --enable-sdl2 --enable-libdav1d --enable-libdavs2 --enable-libuavs3d --enable-libzvbi --enable-librav1e --enable-libsvtav1 --enable-libwebp --enable-libx264 --enable-libx265 --enable-libxavs2 --enable-libxvid --enable-libaom --enable-libjxl --enable-libopenjpeg --enable-libvpx --enable-mediafoundation --enable-libass --enable-frei0r --enable-libfreetype --enable-libfribidi --enable-liblensfun --enable-libvidstab --enable-libvmaf --enable-libzimg --enable-amf --enable-cuda-llvm --enable-cuvid --enable-ffnvcodec --enable-nvdec --enable-nvenc --enable-d3d11va --enable-dxva2 --enable-libmfx --enable-libshaderc --enable-vulkan --enable-libplacebo --enable-opencl --enable-libcdio --enable-libgme --enable-libmodplug --enable-libopenmpt --enable-libopencore-amrwb --enable-libmp3lame --enable-libshine --enable-libtheora --enable-libtwolame --enable-libvo-amrwbenc --enable-libilbc --enable-libgsm --enable-libopencore-amrnb --enable-libopus --enable-libspeex --enable-libvorbis --enable-ladspa --enable-libbs2b --enable-libflite --enable-libmysofa --enable-librubberband --enable-libsoxr --enable-chromaprint libavutil 57. 30.100 / 57. 30.100 libavcodec 59. 40.100 / 59. 40.100 libavformat 59. 29.100 / 59. 29.100 libavdevice 59. 8.101 / 59. 8.101 libavfilter 8. 46.101 / 8. 46.101 libswscale 6. 8.101 / 6. 8.101 libswresample 4. 8.100 / 4. 8.100 libpostproc 56. 7.100 / 56. 7.100 Stream mapping: overlay:default -> Stream #0:0 (png) Press [q] to stop, [?] for help Output #0, image2, to 'out-webp-scale.png': Metadata: encoder : Lavf59.29.100 Stream #0:0: Video: png, rgba(pc, gbr/unknown/unknown, progressive), 200x200 [SAR 1:1 DAR 1:1], q=2-31, 200 kb/s, 25 fps, 25 tbn Metadata: encoder : Lavc59.40.100 png [Parsed_movie_1 @ 0000023dfd060640] EOF timestamp not reliable7 bitrate= -0.0kbits/s speed=N/A [image2 @ 0000023dfd056680] The specified filename 'out-webp-scale.png' does not contain an image sequence pattern or a pattern is invalid. [image2 @ 0000023dfd056680] Use a pattern such as %03d for an image sequence or use the -update option (with -frames:v 1 if needed) to write a single image. [image2 @ 0000023dfd056680] Cannot write more than one file with the same name. Are you missing the -update option or a sequence pattern? av_interleaved_write_frame(): Invalid argument Error muxing a packet for output file #0 frame= 2 fps=0.0 q=-0.0 Lsize=N/A time=00:00:00.60 bitrate=N/A speed=21.4x video:7kB audio:0kB subtitle:0kB other streams:0kB global headers:0kB muxing overhead: unknown Conversion failed!
comment:4 by , 2 years ago
The workaround is to create yet another color=#ffffff00
and overlay
with the webp before the scale
and the following filter graph. (movie
replaced by color+movie+overlay
):
ALPHA PROBLEM: ffmpeg -filter_complex "color=white:200x200[b];movie=x.webp,scale=200:200,[b]overlay" -y out-webp-scale.png ALPHA FIXED: ffmpeg -filter_complex "color=white:200x200[b];color=color=#ffffff00:size=100x100[c];movie=x.webp,[c]overlay,scale=200:200,[b]overlay" -y out-webp-scale-fix.png scale-fix.png
This makes me think that there might some strange format used for webp movie, which can not be enforced/changed by format
filter, but can be changed/fixed by overlay
-ing it to artificial color
by , 2 years ago
by , 2 years ago
comment:5 by , 2 years ago
I have attached new x.png and x.webp which is better for demonstration - not completely white, yet still demonstrates the alpha issue around the white edges
comment:6 by , 2 years ago
After some more testing (and updated .webp and .png exports from my graphic program) it appears the issue not related to webp or pixel format itself, but rather related to the RGB values of the semi-transparent pixel and scale filter. While the shape edge is rendered correctly without scale filter used, once scale
is used, the alpha of the edge pixels gets "premultiplied".
Are you reporting that different input files lead to different output files?
Or that the scale filter handles different input pixel formats differently? If this is the case, using rawvideo input probably makes the issue easier to understand.
In any case, please understand that valid tickets on this bug tracker show a command line including the complete, uncut console output.