Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #2672, comment 3


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jun 15, 2013, 10:13:14 PM (3 years ago)
Author:
gjdfgh
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #2672, comment 3

    initial v1  
    1 In a perfect world you'd probably ask the Libav devs to add a (redundant) new symbol, which would behave the same with two libraries. But I bet $10 that we can't have this. (Maybe you can bait them It's probably best to change the API to Libav's and let the ffmpeg exclusive users burn for it. (Personally I'm already having a ifdef mess in my application to deal with this; it would of course become worse.) 
     1It's probably best to change the API to Libav's and let the ffmpeg exclusive users burn for it. (Personally I'm already having a ifdef mess in my application to deal with this; it would of course become worse.) 
    22 
    33Then the mess wouldn't exist in future ffmpeg releases, at least. 
    44 
    5 In a perfect world you'd probably ask the Libav devs to add a (redundant) new symbol, which would behave the same with two libraries. But I bet $10 that we can't have this. (Maybe you can bait them by introducing a new utility function, that merges avfilter_graph_config()? (Or something similar. I don't understand why these are separate.) 
     5In a perfect world you'd probably ask the Libav devs to add a (redundant) new symbol, which would behave the same with two libraries. But I bet $10 that we can't have this. (Maybe you can bait them by introducing a new utility function, that merges avfilter_graph_config()? Or something similar. I don't understand why these are separate.)