Text content should have "word-wrap: break-word"

[MasterQuestionable]

Else the long URI alike might look ugly.

Local fix (uBlock Origin):
trac.ffmpeg.org## #content:style( word-wrap: break-word; )

Should work for most cases, but caveat this:
​https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=587438#c17

[MasterQuestionable]

Do remember to add "max-width: 100%" for "<img>"s...
uBO:
trac.ffmpeg.org##img:style( max-width: 100%; )

Also, I noted the "[[Image( ... )]]" macro didn't follow redirections:
So [ ​https://github.com/MasterInQuestion/attach/raw/main/@ext/trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/10928/word-wrap.webp ] alike wouldn't work.

[MasterQuestionable]

͏    Unfamiliar with HTML CSS?
͏    .
͏    Anyone with write access to [ ​https://trac.ffmpeg.org/chrome/common/css/trac.css ]:
͏    May append following lines to immediately address the problem:
[[

/* >>>> (0) */
        #content { word-wrap: break-word; }
        img { max-width: 100%; }
/*
        Interim fix to handle broken appearance with long content.
        See [ https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/10928 ] for details.
*/
/* <<<< (0) */

]]
(use Tab for leading space: not preserved by ​processor)

[MasterQuestionable]

͏    Another ​͏"max-width" related issue...


͏    trac.ffmpeg.org##.changes:style( max-width: 40%; )
͏    ; shall fix.

͏    Related definition in:
͏    ​https://trac.ffmpeg.org/chrome/common/css/ticket.css
͏    .
͏    Substitute whose ​͏"width: auto" (implied default) shall work.

[MasterQuestionable]

͏    "word-wrap: break-word"
͏    Recently I think "word-break: break-word" maybe more sensible; but haven't extensively tested.
͏    (they do differ... though confusingly named)

͏    Tried some cases, maybe unpleasant...